31 October 2008
13 October 2008
02 October 2008
01 October 2008
Another Letter (e-mail) Sent to My Senators
My wife and I both called to urge you to vote against the so called "bailout" bill. According to news media reports, you voted for it.
Since you are a republican, and a professed conservative, this has shocked and dismayed me since it seems to imply that you do not believe in maintaining a "free market" but rather are in favor of government intervention and meddling in the free market - which destroys the freedom of the market. I never expected such from you.
If you or some of your staff have the time, I would appreciate an explanation of what you were thinking when you voted for what conservatives perceive as rank "socialism," and the 5th plank in Karl Marx's steps towards communism.
Regards,
29 September 2008
Grand Theft Taxpayer
27 September 2008
Symphony of Destruction
26 September 2008
A Manmade Disaster
Natural evil, as the descriptor signifies, is that type of evil that seems to be, as a part of the natural (fallen) world, amoral. Horrible examples of natural evil abound, things like hurricanes, earthquakes, wildfires, cancer, and so on.
Moral evil, as the descriptor signifies, is that type of evil which (as opposed to natural evil) has a distinctively moral (or immoral) tinge. Horrendous examples of moral evil are things like, theft, rape, murder and torture.
The current “credit crisis” is not a natural evil. The current credit crisis is a moral evil perpetrated against all users of the US dollar.
The proposed solution – the so called “bailout” is another moral evil which will further injure the many while benefiting only a few.
Contrary to the pitiful assertions by Comrade Bush that the free market is “not working,” the Militant Pacifist asserts that the exact opposite is true. The free market is working perfectly. I hesitate to brand “ignorance” as a “lie” (I must remain charitable). The invisible hand of the free market is working just fine!
The free market has made a statement. It has said, I have evaluated the mortgage backed securities and derivative products offered for sale by several major investment banks and I have determined their value to be approximately $0. Hence, I, the free market, offer the princely sum of $0 in exchange for this worthless commercial crap paper.
The proposed “bailout” would come and “re-value” these worthless securities at $700B, or whatever the current number happens to be.
Comrades Paulson and Bernanke would purchase these securities, which the free market has said are worthless ($0) for $700B. The purpose of the purchase would be to “remove this toxic paper from the market.”
But look at what would really happen. Something that the free market values at $0 will be purchased (by force – NOT by an arms-length, free market transaction) for $700B.
In other words $0 worth of value will be removed from the economy, and $700B will be “injected” into the economy.
In a few short months, the money supply will be dramatically increased. The resulting inflation should be obvious. The dramatic increase in the number of dollars circulating in the economy makes each dollar worth less than it was before.
The shirt that used to cost $50, now costs $75. The shirt didn’t actually rise in value – the dollar that’s being used to purchase the shirt actually fell in value – the price of the shirt became “inflated.”
For anyone who has read my ramblings, it should be obvious that I’m a strong proponent of the Austrian School (of economic theory) – but the analysis above doesn’t require that you subscribe to Austrian Economics – it just requires some very basic economic reasoning.
Raising taxes to pay for the “bailout” is not feasible. What will happen is that Comrade Paulson will ask Comrade Bernanke to “authorize” the currency to fund the transaction. The resulting “fiat money” will be “legal tender” for all debts, public or private (i.e., the government will require it to be accepted as payment).
The resulting inflation will effectively tax anyone and everyone who uses the US dollar.
The debasement of a people’s currency is a moral evil which harms people indiscriminately.
Those who commit and support such moral evil are worthy of judgment, and unless they repent, they will certainly be judged.
Alaska paratrooper to get conscientious objector status, discharge
25 September 2008
23 September 2008
The virtue of doing nothing
The position is that there can sometimes be great virtue in doing nothing.
Just because Paulson and Bernanke say something doesn’t really mean that anybody has to do anything.
You see, we could just stand by and “let it crater.” Just because a bunch of folks are screaming, “do something, do something, it’s gonna crater,” doesn’t mean that we have to do anything.
And, “it” might crater, or “it” might not.
But away with Paulson and Bernanke, they merely present a contemporary example of the person who says – “you must act.”
One of the things that I’ve come to realize is that often when someone tells me I have to “do something,” they’re wrong. When they tell me, “you have to decide,” or “you’ve got to choose,” it may not be so. It may be the informal fallacy called “false dilemma.” The fallacy taps into our natural bias for action, but it seems that our natural bias for action is often rooted in emotion rather than wisdom, or rational deliberation.
Now, not all options are good options. When I was a boy and my papa told me to do some certain thing – I had options. I could do what he told me, or I could suffer (my hind-end could suffer).
Christians (as did Christ), learn obedience by the things that they suffer (Hebrews 5:8). So, the idea of obeying God’s commands, or the idea of a child obeying his/her parents is really not what I’m talking about here.
What I’m talking about is most other cases.
In the rock band Rush’s philosophical anthem “Freewill,” Geddy Lee screams, “if you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice.” Though I understand his point, another perspective warrants consideration.
Not choosing is “not choosing.” It is refusing to make a choice. Not choosing is choosing to be passive rather than active. Not choosing is deciding to relinquish the prerogative of choice – with the understanding that something not chosen (something unchosen) may happen.
While such a prospect may be a cause of fear for some, I have come to believe that “not choosing” is often a viable and righteous posture for a Christian.
Imagine that a Christian comes under a violent attack. Many would say that s/he must decide immediately how to respond. This is usually taken to mean that s/he must decide whether to offer resistance (to fight), or to be non-resistant (and maybe to die).
But really…does such a choice have to be made. There seems to be no rational requirement that would force a choice in the moment.
The objector might quote Geddy Lee and say, “well, in such a case, not deciding is the same as deciding.” But such a response is certainly not informed by the Christian worldview. Christianity offers a third way.
In such a situation, might not indecision be the occasion to “stand still, and see the salvation of the LORD (2 Chronicles 20:17)?” In such a situation, might it not be virtuous to “do nothing?”
Contrast this with a naturalistic perspective which would suggest that declining to choose one course of action over another is relinquishing of the human will to power, and when one does such s/he deserves whatever happens to him/her.
Naturalism would suggest that due to the perpetual passage of time, not deciding on a certain course of action may result in something coming about which was not actively chosen – something “random.”
But if one rejects the idea of randomness, is this necessarily a bad thing?
Folks say things like, “you have to do this,” or “you have to do that,” but after many years I have come to realize that I really don’t. Just because someone says that I have to “take action” doesn’t mean that I really do (have to take action).
If the truth be told, all that I have to decide in this moment is - do I take my next breath – or do I pass out.
Realizing this – that I don’t really have to do what it is that someone else says (assuming I’m willing to accept the consequences of inaction) - can be extremely “freeing.”
As I mentioned above, when Comrades Paulson and Bernanke whine about the necessity for quick action to bail out irresponsible banks – that doesn’t really mean that anybody has to do anything. This is not to say that there might be consequences from inaction.
I think I can almost hear the rugged American objection from the “man of action.” “We MUST do something,” he says. But, just because there is an objection, just because you are rugged, or just because you are an individualist, or just because you are an American doesn’t mean you have to do anything.
The American business magnate Martha Stewart spent five months in an American gulag because she thought she had to “take action.” Mrs. Stewart was found guilty of “making false statements to federal investigators.” In other words, because she acted (and surely she must have felt that she “had” to act), she ended up being persecuted (i.e., prosecuted).
I’ll bet if she had it to do over again, she wouldn’t say a word to a “federal investigator.” Much better to have a “federal investigator” think you a dumb (speechless) idiot, than to give him the very ammunition he will use against you. Martha’s best course of action would have been to “do nothing.”
Surely, it requires wisdom to know when it is best to “do nothing,” but we often don’t even entertain the idea of “doing nothing.” Maybe we’ve forgotten that it’s an option.
The Militant Pacifist advocates “doing nothing” (i.e., not taking action) only when “doing nothing” has been chosen. This may not require active “choice,” but certainly it requires thought.
Theologians bifurcate sins into, “sins of omission,” and “sins of commission.” To really see “doing nothing” as a live option, a Christian must have thought through the possibility that sometimes – to do nothing would be sinful.
Realizing this highlights the truth that it requires wisdom and discernment to decide to act, or to do nothing.
Next time the pressure is on you to take action, realize that you may just be suffering from your own bias to action, and consider that there is at least a possibility that “doing nothing” might be virtuous.
Take a chill pill, and consider.
22 September 2008
Text of Draft Proposal for Bailout Plan
Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency.
Wow! That sure sounds imperial. No review of your actions. What would that make you? A god?
Your highness(es) Bernanke and Paulson...
Letter to my Congressman and Senators
_______________________________________________________________________
Dear __________,
I'm writing to encourage you to oppose the federal "bail out" of several irresponsible investment houses, banks and insurance companies.
It is shocking to me that I'm writing you because the proposed intervention sounds more like something that would happen in the former Soviet Union than in the American republic.
Please oppose this governmental power grab which would interfere with our precious free enterprise system.
Americans have seen the failure of authoritarian centralized decision-making and control in the former Soviet Union, and we want none of that over here.
Thank you,
20 September 2008
19 September 2008
King George Demonstrates his Dementia

You can read about it by clicking the link in the posting title above.
The king says, "Our system of free enterprise rests on the conviction that the federal government should interfere in the marketplace only when necessary. Given the precarious state of today's financial markets and their vital importance to the daily lives of the American people, government intervention is not only warranted, it is essential."
Well, there you have it. The king says it's necessary. Oh well. The illusion was nice while it lasted. It's not quite the way they told me it was supposed to work back in high school, but I'm sure the king knows what's best.
I sure am glad I serve a real King. If I didn't, it might be distressing to see these barbarians torching the city.
15 September 2008
B.A.T. (Base Attitude Theory)
The phrase is “base attitude theory,” and the idea came to me [The Militant Pacifist] as I pondered the variety of basic attitudes that people hold towards their governments.
Yesterday, I heard a Chinese Christian describe the current situation for Christians in the People’s Republic of China. He presented a modern history of Christianity in China – a history including rampant suppression and persecution by the Communist government.
During a follow-on discussion, an American Christian interviewer asked the Chinese Christian “do you trust your government?” The Chinese Christian immediately responded, “No!”
The American interviewer followed-up this question with, “well, do you think I should trust my government?” The Chinese Christian seemed perplexed by the question, but after a moment of thought he responded affirmatively, citing the many liberties that American citizens enjoy as ample reason why the American interviewer should trust his government.
I cite the incident above as an example of B.A.T. (base attitude theory). My theory is that the Chinese Christian’s base attitude towards his country’s government was one of distrust (even fear) because of the life experiences that he or others have had with his government. These experiences have shaped his attitude so that his base response to his government is fear and distrust. If you have read anything about Chinese communism’s treatment of Christians – you will appreciate that his base attitude is justified.
Most Americans I encounter have a much more favorable attitude towards their government than does the Chinese Christian. Maybe their more favorable attitude is justified, or maybe they have been more “slickly propagandized” and less intimidated than the Chinese Christian. In any case, it seems that most Americans feel more threatened by Iraqis and Iranians than they do by their own government.
I have never had an “unpleasant” experience with either an Iraqi or an Iranian – but most experiences I have had with my government have been unpleasant [granted, I have never discharged a firearm in the direction of an Iraqi or an Iranian].
I’m trying to live a righteous life, but every time I see a letter in my mailbox with “IRS” on the envelope – my mouth gets dry and my pulse increases. When I see my local militarized police, with their Marine Corps haircuts, “terminator” sunglasses, and combat boots, my stomach jumps and I think, “am I doing anything wrong?”
My base attitude towards my government is distrust, fear and ambivalence. It is the Militant Pacifist’s opinion that this attitude would have been advised, encouraged and commended by the great scientists who started the American political experiment (men like Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin).
Christians are not to be rebellious (1 Samuel 15:23). They are even commanded to be subject to certain powers (Romans 13:1-7).
Lest this ramble seem uncharitable (or un-Christian) - the Militant Pacifist often has to remind himself that God commands prayer for government officials - specifically, prayer that they (government officials, principalities and powers) will leave us alone (1 Timothy 2:1-2); And he does ([I do] pray for them).
Sometimes, this seems difficult for me. I doubt it is difficult at all for a Chinese Christian.
09 September 2008
Thrownness and Faith
One of the Heideggerian concepts that I return to over and over is the idea of thrown-ness (or thrownness). You can research the definition yourself (Heidegger is very difficult to read and understand, and I'm told that he is just as difficult to understand in Deutsch), but my recollection of Heideggerian thrownness comprehends the idea of being “thrown” into existence, or “thrown” into the world (more specifically being thrown into being in the world).
It’s like this. Wherever we are, at this very moment in our lives, with no exceptions, is where we have been thrown. For Heidegger, it is really not necessary to figure out who threw us, or why we have been thrown, or towards what or where we are being thrown. Most of us (if we think) spend an inordinate amount of intellectual energy on those distractions. The key to thrownness is not really about that; it is that we have been thrown, and that we can attend to (focus on) our thrownness. We can be conscious of it and contemplate it.
Think of it like this (this is the way I think of it). On a certain day in the 1960’s, I enter the realm of the born; I am “thrown” into existence. Because of a series of historico-political events, with which I had nothing to do, I enter the realm of the born in a certain socio-political entity (a nation-state) that calls itself the United States of America.
Stop here for a minute.
Does any of this seem right so far? It does to me. Does it seem to make the idea of “free will” in any ultimate sense – an archaic idea? I mean, if you are “thrown” into existence in a place that you certainly did not choose – and your parents send you to a school that you certainly did not choose – and things happen to you frequently over which you (seemingly) exercise no control – does this not make the idea of free will loose its desirability as a topic for extended discussion.
It certainly does to me. Currently, I consider myself a compatibilist (but then, maybe I haven’t understood all the arguments).
With the idea of thrownness in mind, one of the great things about being a Christian, and stopping to think now and then, is understanding (by the understanding of faith, Hebrews 11:3) that I know my “thrower” and He is good.
Though I’m thrown, I’m not randomly falling (though it may feel like it). My trajectory has been planned and is currently being executed with extreme precision – in fact, at this very moment – I’m right where I’m supposed to be.
And so, as funny as it sounds, to some degree – I become comfortable with the feeling of falling.
What sheer terror it must be, not to know the thrower.
07 September 2008
Pirates and Emperors
05 September 2008
Patience - the Key to Obedience
03 September 2008
What Belongs to Caesar?
01 September 2008
Labor of Love
As you can see, the Militant Pacifist makes his own!
After "dry basting" the pork spareribs over night, in they go:
29 August 2008
26 August 2008
19 August 2008
18 August 2008
17 August 2008
14 August 2008
John W. Robbins - RIP
Nonviolence in the Ancient Church and Christian Obedience
13 August 2008
08 August 2008
So you think this man is a Christian?
Thanks to the folks "EverVigilant.net" for this link.
You can visit "EverVigilant.net" by clicking the link in the posting title above.
06 August 2008
The Military Lies
04 August 2008
Slip-Sliding Away
03 August 2008
01 August 2008
Some Facts of Power – and a Question
Sometimes...it's good to be troubled!
18 July 2008
Christians and Guns
The Militant Pacifist is a strong proponent of individual persons possessing as much "defensive technology" (you can read that however you want to) as they desire. The Militant Pacifist is also definitively Christian. Therefore, it was not without (a little) grief that I read John Piper's deficient explanation of why he (personally) doesn't own "defensive technology," and why he advises others not to.17 July 2008
The War the Government Cannot Win
Click on the link in the posting title above...go ahead...click it...click it...and read...Tolle Lege!
15 July 2008
04 July 2008
July 4th In Bizarro World
02 July 2008
Irony of ironies
"Therefore thou art inexcusable, O man, whosoever thou art that judgest: for wherein thou judgest another, thou condemnest thyself; for thou that judgest doest the same things. But we are sure that the judgment of God is according to truth against them which commit such things. And thinkest thou this, O man, that judgest them which do such things, and doest the same, that thou shalt escape the judgment of God?" Romans 2:1-3
"O LORD...in wrath, remember mercy" Habakkuk 3:2
30 June 2008
Pro Libertate: The Heller Misdirection
26 June 2008
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ET AL. v. HELLER
23 June 2008
Reflections on the Origin and the Stability of the State
Dr. Hoppe is always an enjoyable read. If you enjoy the article linked above, check out the lecture "A World Without Theft" at:
http://www.mises.org/MultiMedia/mp3/misescircle2006b/Hoppe.mp3
“Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.” Aldous Huxley
19 June 2008
Haditha Marine prepares to sue Murtha over smear
The Militant Pacifist wishes him the best, but this characterization begs the question – what was he doing in Haditha?
There was a prophet (John, the baptizer) of whom God (Jesus Christ) said “Among them that are born of women there hath not risen a greater than John the Baptist (Matthew 11:11).” Apparently, the Lord Jesus Christ had a very high regard for John.
One day some soldiers came to John and asked him, “what shall we do? (Luke 13:14).”
John’s answer is instructive. He answers them, “do violence to no man.”
Violence is the soldier’s business, so what he (John) is really saying to them is “find another job.”
Major Premise: Christians should not be violent
Minor Premise: The ultimate job of a soldier is to do violence
Conclusion: A Christian should not be a soldier
This was the consensus of the Church fathers, and the practice of Christians until the Constantinian creation of “Christendom” (for more on this, read The Reformers and their Stepchildren, by Leonard Verduin).
“Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.” Galatians 6:7
16 June 2008
Politics Is a Game
You can read Charley Reese's latest musing by clicking the link in the posting title above.
11 June 2008
Tolstoy's Majority
RESIST TYRANNY!
10 June 2008
26 May 2008
Christian “Mind Games”
Maybe one way to reduce the stress and distress would be to avoid the news – but the Militant Pacifist thinks there is an even better way:
When David returned to Ziklag after being forbidden to go on a raid with Achish, he found his wives and children missing, and his house on fire. His companions became so irate that they spoke of stoning him. In the midst of this distress – the scriptures teach that David “encouraged himself in the LORD his God (1 Samuel 30:6).
Though David was so downcast that he couldn’t encourage others – he had enough presence of mind (or divine grace) that he was able to encourage himself in the LORD.
Though some might consider the advocacy of self-talk and divine contemplation as measures to combat distress or depression as advocating “mind-games,” the practice has a venerable history in Christian piety.
As noted above, David practices the technique in 1st Samuel 30, (other great examples are in Psalms 42, 43 and 73) and it was David who wrote in Psalm 37:4 “Delight thyself also in the LORD: and he shall give thee the desires of thine heart.”
In the New Testament, we find the great Apostle Paul advocating Christian thought control - “Finally, brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good report; if there be any virtue, and if there be any praise, think on these things (Philippians 4:8),” and even encouraging active manipulation/direction of the human affections. Writing to the Colossians, he says – “Set your affection on things above, not on things on the earth (Colossians 3:2).”
Let’s play mind games!
20 May 2008
16 May 2008
15 May 2008
Sermons We See
I’d rather one should walk with me than merely tell the way.
The eye’s a better pupil and more willing than the ear,
Fine counsel is confusing, but example’s always clear;
And the best of all the preachers are the men who live their creeds,
For to see good put in action is what everybody needs.
I soon can learn to do it if you’ll let me see it done;
I can watch your hands in action, but your tongue too fast may run.
And the lecture you deliver may be very wise and true,
But I’d rather get my lessons by observing what you do;
For I might misunderstand you and the high advice you give,
But there’s no misunderstanding how you act and how you live.
When I see a deed of kindness, I am eager to be kind.
When a weaker brother stumbles and a strong man stays behind
Just to see if he can help him, then the wish grows strong in me
To become as big and thoughtful as I know that friend to be.
And all travelers can witness that the best of guides today
Is not the one who tells them, but the one who shows the way.
One good man teaches many, men believe what they behold;
One deed of kindness noticed is worth forty that are told.
Who stands with men of honor learns to hold his honor dear,
For right living speaks a language which to every one is clear.
Though an able speaker charms me with his eloquence, I say,
I’d rather see a sermon than to hear one, any day.
- Edgar Albert Guest (1881 – 1959)
12 May 2008
Even the sins of the saints...
From Thomas Brooks, "The Crown and Glory of Christianity, or, HOLINESS, the Only Way to Happiness", 1662"And we know that all things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are the called according to his purpose."
Romans 8:28
All the afflictions, and
all the temptations, and
all the desertions, and
all the oppressions, and
all the oppositions, and
all the persecutions—
which befall a godly man,
shall work for his good.
Every cross, and
every loss, and
every disease—
which befall the holy man,
shall work for his good.
Every device,
every snare,
every deceit,
every depth,
every stratagem,
and every enterprise of Satan against
the holy man, shall work for his good.
They shall all help to make him . . .
more humble,
more holy,
more heavenly,
more spiritual,
more faithful,
more fruitful,
more watchful.
Every prosperity and every adversity;
every storm and every calm;
every bitter and every sweet;
every cross and every comfort—
shall work for the holy man's good.
When God gives a mercy—
that shall work for his good.
When God takes away a mercy—
that shall work for his good.
Yes, even all the falls and all the sins of
the saints shall work for their good. Oh . . .
the care,
the fear,
the watchfulness,
the tenderness,
the zeal—
which God raises in the souls of His saints by their
very falls! Oh the hatred, the indignation, and the
detestation—which God raises in the hearts of His
children against sin—by their very falling into sin!
Oh what love to Christ,
what thankfulness for Christ,
what admiration of Christ,
what cleaving to Christ,
what exalting of Christ,
what drawings from Christ's grace—
are saints led to, by their very falls!
It is the glory of God's holiness, that . . .
He can turn spiritual diseases—into holy remedies!
He can turn soul poisons—into heavenly cordials!
He can prevent sin by sin, and cure falling by falling!
O Christian! What though friends and relations frown upon you,
what though enemies are plotting and conspiring against you,
what though needs, like armed men, are breaking in upon you,
what though men rage, and devils roar against you,
what though sickness is devastating your family,
what though death stands every day at your elbow—
yet there is no reason for you to fear nor faint, because
all these things shall work for your good! Yes, there is
wonderful cause of joy and rejoicing in all the afflictions
and tribulations which come upon you—considering that
they shall all work for your good.
O Christians! I am afraid, I am afraid—that you do not
run so often as you should—to the breasts of this promise,
nor draw that sweetness and comfort from it, that it would
yield, and that your several cases may require. "We know
that all things work together for good, to those who love
God, to those who are called according to His purpose." I
have been the longer upon this verse, because the condition
of God's people calls for the strongest cordials, and the
choicest and the sweetest comforts.
08 May 2008
04 May 2008
From the mouths of babes...
18 April 2008
A Handout for Statists
17 April 2008
Why Limited Representative Government Fails
24 March 2008
Reflections on Resurrection Sunday: We're Commanded To Be Free
you can read it by clicking on the link in the posting title above.
27 January 2008
"Real World" Christianity
The Militant Pacifist is currently reading The Divine Conspiracy: Rediscovering Our Hidden Life in God by Dallas Willard (Christian, Baptist, Scholar and currently Professor of Philosophy at USC). At present, the Militant Pacifist is only about 100 pages into this 400-page book and is finding it slow going due to his having to underline almost everything. To get a feel for the incisive nature of this work, enjoy the convicting quotation below:
“In any context in which people are supposed to be smart and informed, even the most thoughtful and devout Christian will find it hard to make a convincing presentation of the relevance of God and his spiritual world to “real life.”
The “real” world has little room for a God of sparrows and children. To it, Jesus can only seem “otherworldly” – a good-hearted person out of touch with reality. Yes, it must be admitted that he is influential, but only because he affirms what weak-minded and fainthearted individuals fantasize in the face of a brutal world. He is like a cheerleader who continues to shout, “We are going to win,” though the score is 98 to 3 against us in the last minute of the game.
When this cheerleading approach to the “real world” triumphs among those who profess Christ, they may then have faith in faith but will have little faith in God. For God and his world are just not “real” to them. They may believe in believing but not be able to rely on God – like many in our current culture who love love but in practice are unable to love real people. They may believe in prayer, think it is quite a good thing, but be unable to pray believing and so will rarely, if ever, pray at all.”
Willard, Dallas. The Divine Conspiracy: Rediscovering Our Hidden Life in God. San Francisco. Harper Collins, 1997. p 91.
25 January 2008
Amerika the Beautiful...what happened to you?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-taU9d26wT4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DgPR9I4KMNI
23 January 2008
Modern Political Science Is a Farce
To those infected with the sickening disease of "nationalism," the very idea that their beloved "state" is illegitimate may be disturbing - but may we agree that truth is always better than lies?
To read a concise analysis of (just) one question which modern political thinkers reliably refuse to engage, click on the link in the posting title above.
THINK…the Militant Pacifist recommends it!
*http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophical_anarchism
22 January 2008
I / Me / Myself
Probably the reason it bugs me so much is that by and large when I hear someone use "myself" in a non-reflexive way, they are using it ("myself") because they think it is correct. Probably they had a writing instructor at some time warn them against overusing the personal pronoun "me," and probably they think that "myself" sounds intelligent.
Here's a hint. It doesn't sound intelligent. If you want to use the word (and it is a good word) you should learn how to use it so you won't sound unintelligent.
You can read a brief explanation of the proper use of "myself" by the author of Common Errors in English Usage by clicking the link in the posting title above. If you are interested in the book, you can buy it at:
http://www.amazon.com/Common-Errors-English-Usage-Brians/dp/1887902899/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1201052561&sr=8-1
15 January 2008
On Dissolving the United States of America
You can read the essay by clicking on the link in the posting title above.
31 December 2007
Holy Treason
Of course the Militant Pacifist believes that true and lasting happiness is only found in the worship of the true God - Jesus of Nazareth - the Christ of God. So I wish you true happiness - and encourage you in the new year to THINK (and don't let others do your thinking for you).
If you'd like a little intellectual stimulation - please click on the link in the posting title above.
20 December 2007
Gumbeaux Time!
04 December 2007
30 October 2007
Enjoy Da Vinci's "Last Supper" in detail!
04 October 2007
Fictions and False Gods
Don't worship the idol(s).
Click on the link in the posting title above...
01 October 2007
Ernie Said It
You can read about it by clicking the link in the posting title above.
27 September 2007
Constantinian Christianity
How could this happen?
Well, a wrong thought (if thought for long enough) may begin to seem right (i.e., "not wrong"). When this happens, the thought is still wrong - but the thinker has lost the perspective to see that the thought is wrong. S/he has become so convinced of the "rightness" of the thought, that only a radical change of mind can make such a thinker reject the wrong thought.
The article linked in the posting title above briefly describes how some of this wrong thinking got started.
The echo of Tertullian’s famous question rings still - "What has Athens to do with Jerusalem?"
30 August 2007
American Idols
Many beloved, but unthinking, Christians violate this commandment (not thinking is sinning).
You can read how by clicking the link in the posting title above. The Militant Pacifist recommends that you click it...now...
24 August 2007
War Without End
You can read about it by clicking on the link in the posting title above.
16 August 2007
If the President Does It, It's Not Illegal?
That's it!
The Militant Pacifist is sickened that so many have bought into "statism," and support a bankrupt regime - to the potential detriment of their own integrity (as the Militant Pacifist's Papa taught him "right is always right, and wrong is always wrong").
With all of this in mind, the Militant Pacifist links (click on the posting title above) to an article by a lawyer (may God have mercy on his soul) that he finds informative.
You (reader) ought to support "right," whether or not it has anything to do with some government. Governments come and go - but truth - why, that - truth - abides!
14 August 2007
Statism is Counterintuitive
You can read a cogent critique of statism by clicking the link in the posting title above.
"and a little child shall lead them." (Isaiah 11:6)
12 August 2007
30 July 2007
Nominalism vs. Moderate Realism (Ron Paul, Thomist)
18 July 2007
A couple of quotes on the "Judgment of God"
1st, from Charlie Sexton's (an incredible Texas musician - songwriter, guitarist and co-frontman for the Arcangels, guitarist for Bob Dylan's band ['97-'04], and producer and contributor for a bunch of great albums - yeah folks, it's rock-n-roll) 2005 album Cruel and Gentle Things, and the song "Gospel:"
"Well the preacher shamed you,
but the preacher lied,
he may say you're damned,
but it aint’ him who decides,
and if you're lookin' for forgiveness,
you better hit your knees,
and if you're askin' Jesus,
you better ask Him 'please'."
2nd, from Lesslie Newbigin's book (a collection of lectures), Signs Amid the Rubble: The Purposes of God in Human History (Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 2003, Pg 41):
"It is basic to all Christian ethics that the final judgment upon conduct is the judgment of God. All Christians would agree with that. Not the judgment of contemporaries, not our own judgment, not even the judgment of history so-called, but the judgment of God is that with which we finally have to deal. If we deny that, we have to say that in the end only results matter, and motives do not. That is what Marxists say, and they are logical about it. They know that it means throwing overboard the whole Christian moral tradition. But it is common, I think, to all Christians that the final judgment, and therefore the judgment with which we have to reckon, is the judgment of God."
The Militant Pacifist says, "Amen, and Rock-on" - or - should I say, "Rock-on, and Amen!"
04 July 2007
The Case for Independence
20 June 2007
A Culture of Atrocity
The Democracy Worshipper
You can read the "rightness" by clicking on the link in the posting title above.
13 June 2007
Isn’t the Law Already In Our Hands?
Anyway - you should read this tome from an American thinker - you can click on the link in the posting title above...
05 June 2007
Not For Freedom
30 May 2007
26 May 2007
Memorial Day
I'm glad the defacto occupation state legislates this holiday, 'cause I like barbeque - but - before you buy into "Memorial" day ideology, read the article linked in the posting title above - an article by a peacable English teacher.
"Blessed are the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God." God (Matthew 5:9)
24 May 2007
Dr. Paul on the Nature of "Patriotism"
To speak truth to power - why - that's a Christian duty!
You can read Dr. Paul's speech by clicking on the link in the posting title above.
22 May 2007
Pastor, Prophet and Priest
13 May 2007
Benevolence and BBQ Shrimp!
"Benevolence" comes from the Latin root "bene" for "good," and "volente," for "will." To be benevolent is to have a "good will." "Benevolence," means - "A kindly act;" or, a "gift given out of generosity" (as defined by The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition Copyright © 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company).
As much as is in him, the Militant Pacifist is a benevolent personage. As much as is in him, the Militant Pacifist "loves" the sons and daughters of men in general. With this tentative love in mind - this Louisiana boy (the Militant Pacifist) reveals to you a secret. This is a valuable secret - and the Militant Pacifist has no inkling of how long this effusion of "good will" will last - so you had better copy fast - or maybe you had better click 'print'. This recipe is from an old New Orleans restaurant - I can say no more than that, as I must protect covert sources and the Militant Pacifist!
If you have noticed, the fact that shrimp even exist - is evidence of the general beneficence of Almighty God to the sons of men in general. Each shrimp = one bite! How does this happen? It happens in the gracious providence of a loving God!
Now, for the candy - and if you want this - you had better get it now. It could be taken down by evil powers. I share it with you, only because of "benevolence."
Bar-B-Que Shrimp (and this is not "barbeque" in the Memphis or Texas style) - this is the Epicurean cuisine of pure Sodom (New Orleans) - and it is "good, good, good!"
Recipe:
3# Shrimp (large, or the biggest you can find on sale) - save your big $ for the best red vino you can splurge on!
1/2# salted butter - cut into 1/4" slices.
1/2 Cup good oil (extra virgin Italian olive oil is preferred) - this dish is "extra," and it is "virginal!"
1 Tablespoon dried parsley leaves.
1 Teaspoon Dried Oregano leaves.
3 Pods of Fresh Garlic, crushed or finely chopped.
2 Lemons (or limes), thinly sliced.
2 Tablespoons sea salt.
3 Tablespoons coarsely cracked black Malabar pepper.
2 Tablespoons Lea & Perrin (if you don't know what this is - please exit now - you are in way over your head).
Put a layer of shrimp in a 9 x 13" or larger pan.
Sprinkle 1/2 of the seasoning mixture and salt over the shrimp.
Distribute 1/2 of the lemon slices, butter chunks (or slices) and oil over the shrimp.
Add 1/2 of the Lea & Perrin, salt, garlic, etc.
Add a 2nd layer of shrimp, and the remaining spices, salt, butter, oil, etc.
Place the pan in a 400 degree (F) oven for 10 minutes.
Remove the pan and turn, stir and thoroughly mix the shrimp and spices.
Cook for 10-15 more minutes - or until shrimp are orange, even slightly browned on top (DO NOT OVERCOOK!)
Serve this dish with the best red wine you can afford (Zinfandel, or Cab is recommended), with good fresh crusty French bread (this is to be dipped in the sop, "the sauce" with friends), and with a fine Caesar Salad (if you can make your own dressing - even better!).
I'm not sure it gets much better than this friends! I think that this is what they are eating in the outer courts of heaven.
This dish is best enjoyed with beloved friends, good wine, and delta blues playing on the stereo (Buddy Guy, Albert Collins, B.B. King, or even T-Bone Walker would be great).
I give you this because of benevolence - because of a "good will." But my desire is that you not only feast on the bounty of providence in time - but in eternity. May our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ Himself feed you the bread and wine of his flesh and blood - for this is life indeed!
Ciao!
11 May 2007
Put No Confidence in Princes...
If you are a lover of thinkers and a lover of souls, pray for this poor man. It is obvious that he is in the clutches of the deceiver. You can read his statement by clicking on the posting title above.
09 May 2007
Migraines
The Militant Pacifist replied – “I don’t know darling – I don’t know – I think I’m dying. I love you baby – I love you.” But – that was not the end. A diagnosis of “migraine headaches” followed.
Turns out – there is a maternal family history. If you don’t know, migraine headaches are horrible. Generally, they are “triggered” by something. Neurologists recommend that sufferers keep a journal of activities, foods, mood-states, etc. when a migraine begins in hope of identifying the “trigger” so that future “triggering” can be avoided.
The Militant Pacifist’s major trigger seems to be atmospheric pressure. Hence, when storms roll in – headaches are on board.
Such headaches are depressing. They can last for days – even more than a week – with only intermittent relief. The persistent pain can cause exhaustion, distress, an inability to maintain focus on work, and even depression. Medications are available, but it seems that sometimes they work – and sometimes they don’t, and their side effects are unpleasant.
Why Lord, why?
Because – comes the answer – because “my grace is sufficient for thee,” and “my strength is made perfect in weakness (II Corinthians 12:9).”
Yes Master. Please give me more grace.
06 May 2007
Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (an Existential Quote)
Wittgenstein is generally NOT associated with the existential movement of the 20th century (a movement to which the Militant Pacifist has a perverse attraction), however, the following “existential” quotation from Wittgenstein's "Tractatus," 6.43, seems weighty indeed. Ponder this:
"The world of the happy man is a different one from that of the unhappy man."
30 April 2007
Will Ron Paul Be the Candidate of the Christian Right?
You can read Mr. Vance's latest musing by clicking on the link in the posting title above.
07 April 2007
What music would Jesus listen to?
Because she knows me (and still loves me) she e-mailed me a recent editorial by one of her co-workers at the paper. His views approximate those of The Militant Pacifist quite nicely.
A quotation from the editorial - "Let's face it, AC/DC is just a lot more fun to listen to than Stephen Curtis Chapman" - may spark your interest.
If so, click on the link in the posting title above to read the editorial...and...rock on!
28 February 2007
When I consider the heavens...
"When I consider thy heavens, the work of thy fingers, the moon and the stars, which thou hast ordained; What is man, that thou art mindful of him? and the son of man, that thou visitest him? For thou hast made him a little lower than the angels, and hast crowned him with glory and honour. Thou madest him to have dominion over the works of thy hands; thou hast put all things under his feet: All sheep and oxen, yea, and the beasts of the field; The fowl of the air, and the fish of the sea, and whatsoever passeth through the paths of the seas. O LORD our Lord, how excellent is thy name in all the earth! (Psalm 8:3-9)."Friend, those are not stars...those are galaxies (other "solar" systems).
"God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets, Hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also he made the worlds (Hebrews 1:1-2)."
Worship King Jesus!
24 February 2007
Christ in Cambodia
05 February 2007
10 January 2007
Trainwreck
30 December 2006
Saddam, Stalin, Hitler, and History
There's also an interesting analysis here (http://news.independent.co.uk/world/fisk/article2112555.ece)
23 December 2006
Halleujah - He has come!
1 And it came to pass in those days, that there went out a decree from Caesar Augustus, that all the world should be taxed.
2 (And this taxing was first made when Cyrenius was governor of Syria.)
3 And all went to be taxed, every one into his own city.
4 And Joseph also went up from Galilee, out of the city of Nazareth, into Judaea, unto the city of David, which is called Bethlehem; (because he was of the house and lineage of David:)
5 To be taxed with Mary his espoused wife, being great with child.
6 And so it was, that, while they were there, the days were accomplished that she should be delivered.
7 And she brought forth her firstborn son, and wrapped him in swaddling clothes, and laid him in a manger; because there was no room for them in the inn.
8 And there were in the same country shepherds abiding in the field, keeping watch over their flock by night.
9 And, lo, the angel of the Lord came upon them, and the glory of the Lord shone round about them: and they were sore afraid.
10 And the angel said unto them, Fear not: for, behold, I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people.
11 For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord.
12 And this shall be a sign unto you; Ye shall find the babe wrapped in swaddling clothes, lying in a manger.
13 And suddenly there was with the angel a multitude of the heavenly host praising God, and saying,
14 Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace, good will toward men.
15 And it came to pass, as the angels were gone away from them into heaven, the shepherds said one to another, Let us now go even unto Bethlehem, and see this thing which is come to pass, which the Lord hath made known unto us.
16 And they came with haste, and found Mary, and Joseph, and the babe lying in a manger.
17 And when they had seen it, they made known abroad the saying which was told them concerning this child.
18 And all they that heard it wondered at those things which were told them by the shepherds.
19 But Mary kept all these things, and pondered them in her heart.
20 And the shepherds returned, glorifying and praising God for all the things that they had heard and seen, as it was told unto them.
21 And when eight days were accomplished for the circumcising of the child, his name was called JESUS, which was so named of the angel before he was conceived in the womb.
22 And when the days of her purification according to the law of Moses were accomplished, they brought him to Jerusalem, to present him to the Lord;
23 (As it is written in the law of the Lord, Every male that openeth the womb shall be called holy to the Lord;)
24 And to offer a sacrifice according to that which is said in the law of the Lord, A pair of turtledoves, or two young pigeons.
25 And, behold, there was a man in Jerusalem, whose name was Simeon; and the same man was just and devout, waiting for the consolation of Israel: and the Holy Ghost was upon him.
26 And it was revealed unto him by the Holy Ghost, that he should not see death, before he had seen the Lord's Christ.
27 And he came by the Spirit into the temple: and when the parents brought in the child Jesus, to do for him after the custom of the law,
28 Then took he him up in his arms, and blessed God, and said,
29 Lord, now lettest thou thy servant depart in peace, according to thy word:
30 For mine eyes have seen thy salvation,
31 Which thou hast prepared before the face of all people;
32 A light to lighten the Gentiles, and the glory of thy people Israel.
33 And Joseph and his mother marvelled at those things which were spoken of him.
34 And Simeon blessed them, and said unto Mary his mother, Behold, this child is set for the fall and rising again of many in Israel; and for a sign which shall be spoken against;
35 (Yea, a sword shall pierce through thy own soul also,) that the thoughts of many hearts may be revealed.
36 And there was one Anna, a prophetess, the daughter of Phanuel, of the tribe of Aser: she was of a great age, and had lived with an husband seven years from her virginity;
37 And she was a widow of about fourscore and four years, which departed not from the temple, but served God with fastings and prayers night and day.
38 And she coming in that instant gave thanks likewise unto the Lord, and spake of him to all them that looked for redemption in Jerusalem.
39 And when they had performed all things according to the law of the Lord, they returned into Galilee, to their own city Nazareth.
40 And the child grew, and waxed strong in spirit, filled with wisdom: and the grace of God was upon him.
41 Now his parents went to Jerusalem every year at the feast of the passover.
42 And when he was twelve years old, they went up to Jerusalem after the custom of the feast.
43 And when they had fulfilled the days, as they returned, the child Jesus tarried behind in Jerusalem; and Joseph and his mother knew not of it.
44 But they, supposing him to have been in the company, went a day's journey; and they sought him among their kinsfolk and acquaintance.
45 And when they found him not, they turned back again to Jerusalem, seeking him.
46 And it came to pass, that after three days they found him in the temple, sitting in the midst of the doctors, both hearing them, and asking them questions.
47 And all that heard him were astonished at his understanding and answers.
48 And when they saw him, they were amazed: and his mother said unto him, Son, why hast thou thus dealt with us? behold, thy father and I have sought thee sorrowing.
49 And he said unto them, How is it that ye sought me? wist ye not that I must be about my Father's business?
50 And they understood not the saying which he spake unto them.
51 And he went down with them, and came to Nazareth, and was subject unto them: but his mother kept all these sayings in her heart.
52 And Jesus increased in wisdom and stature, and in favour with God and man.
18 December 2006
Americans Are No Imperialists
"Blessed are the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God ("God," i.e., Jesus Christ, Matthew 5:9)"
02 December 2006
God Has No Cause
There are those who talk about God's cause, and about wanting to serve that cause. This is all very fine, but how, exactly, is this to be interpreted? The common view thinks that God has a cause in the human sense of the word, that he is some kind of advocate, interested in having his cause win and therefore eager to help the person who would serve his cause, and so forth. If we follow this line of thinking God becomes a minor character who arrives at the embarrassing dilemma of needing human beings.
No, no! God has no cause, is no advocate in this sense. For God everything is infinitely nothing. Any second he wills it, everything, including all opposition to his cause, becomes nothing. Wanting to serve God's cause can never mean the same thing as coming to his aid. No, to serve God's cause is to face examination. If someone wants to serve his cause, it is not God who loses his balance and sublimity; no, he fixes his attention upon this volunteer - observantly - and sees how he conducts himself, whether he has integrity and resolve. Because God is not interested in temporal causes, because he is infinitely the conquering Lord, precisely for that reason he examines. He is quite able to accomplish his will alone.
This is why the more one is involved with God the more rigorous everything becomes. It is out of God's infinite love that he involves himself with every human being. The very fact that God permits evil people to thrive in this world is a mark of his infinite majesty. Do you not understand this frightful punishment, that God overlooks them? God's punishment is upon those he chooses to have nothing more to do with. And yet he always accomplishes what he wills.
We usually think that when we honestly want to serve God's cause, God will also help us along. Well, how? In a material way? By a successful outcome, prosperity, earthly advantage, or the like? But in that case everything gets turned around and it no longer remains God's cause but a finite endeavor. Besides, maybe I am only a cunning fellow, who really does not want to serve God but in a deceptive, pious way to cheat God to my advantage.
Perhaps I even think that God is in a bind and is made happy as soon as someone volunteers to serve his cause. Utter nonsense and blasphemy! No, God is spirit - and our task is to be transformed into spirit. But spirit is absolutely opposed to being related to God by way of temporal benefits. Such is God's sublimity - and yet this is the infinite love of God!
Yes, infinite love, so infinite that God desires to involve himself with every human being, with every weak, foolish, carnal heart who tries to make him into a nice uncle, a really fine grandfather whom we can make good use of.
God is infinite love and for this reason has no cause. He will not suddenly overpower a person and demand that he instantly become spirit. If that were the case we would all perish. No, he handles each person gently. His is a long operation, an upbringing in love. Yes, there are times when one gasps and God strengthens with material blessings. But there is one thing God requires unconditionally at every moment - integrity - that one does not reverse the relationship and try to prove his relationship to God or the truth of his cause by good fortune, prosperity, and the like. God wants us to understand that material blessings are a concession to our weakness and very likely something he will withdraw at some later date to help us make true progress, not in some finite endeavor but in passing the examination.
21 November 2006
Bush Almighty!
You can read the diatribe by clicking on the link in the posting title above.
Happy Thanksgiving!
The Militant Pacifist is thankful that his future does not depend upon the wisdom of fools!
06 November 2006
Are you okay friend?
Not really “cool,” but the Militant Pacifist has benefited greatly from the books of Dr. James Dobson – books like “Love Must Be Tough,” “Bringing up Boys,” and “What Wives Wish their Husbands knew about Women.” The man has wisdom and skill with words, and his words and writing have been a blessing to many Christians.
My (grief, disappointment, disgust) emotion was over what I heard – on the radio program (words of caution, words of warning, words of fear). This week is “election” week in America. In the USA this week, we enter into the holy of holies and exercise our sacred (gag) right-to-vote. Dr. Dobson is greatly concerned about the future of America.
We are at a cross-road – the time is critical – before us are life and death – evil and good – right and wrong – democrats and republicans. If you are a good (FoF) Christian – you will make the right choice – you will be one of “Nehemiah’s re-builders” – you will be one of the saviors of America.
All of this makes me feel sick (nauseous). This is a righteous man – but he has totally bought in to the myth of “Christian” America.
The Militant Pacifist believes differently. The Militant Pacifist believes that either America = Sodom, or America approximates Sodom. God will judge America. God has judged America. God is judging America. Anyone who places hope or confidence in America is destined to a life of fear, depression, despondency and confusion. God will not bless America – that is over!
The blood is not coming – the blood is already in the streets. The foolish will look to men for help – but there is no help in man.
The republican is the devil. The democrat is Mephistopheles. America is the bastard son of the enlightenment. The corrupted (little “r”) reason of man must bow to the (capital “R”) reason (λογος) of God. It always has, and it always will. The truth is hard – but it never changes. Politicians are (all) liars. Don’t hold that against them – it is their job.
We do not need a new politician. We do not need a different politician. We need a king!
The Militant Pacifist has a king, and the Militant Pacifist is at peace.
Dear, beloved Dr. Dobson - are we on the same page? After Tuesday night (election night), where will your God (god?) be? My God will be firmly upon His throne! Μy mind will be at peace. Put no confidence in princes (especially republicans), nor for help on man depend, he shall die, to dust returning – and his purposes shall end.
All Glory to the King of Kings, the Lord of Lords, the Prince of Peace – Jesus Christ, the Lord of All!!!





+001.jpg)
